Aggregating Partial Rankings with Applications to Peer Grading in Massive Online Open Courses

We investigate the potential of using ordinal peer grading for the evaluation of students in massive online open courses (MOOCs). According to such grading schemes, each student receives a few assignments (by other students) which she has to rank. Then, a global ranking (possibly translated into numerical scores) is produced by combining the individual ones. This is a novel application area for social choice concepts and methods where the important problem to be solved is as follows: how should the assignments be distributed so that the collected individual rankings can be easily merged into a global one that is as close as possible to the ranking that represents the relative performance of the students in the assignment? Our main theoretical result suggests that using very simple ways to distribute the assignments so that each student has to rank only k of them, a Borda-like aggregation method can recover a 1 − O(1/k) fraction of the true ranking when each student correctly ranks t...

• Type: Journal
• Year: 2015
• Where: ATAL
• Authors: Ioannis Caragiannis, George A. Krimpas, Alexandros A. Voudouris
• Keywords: ATAL 2015, Intelligent Agents