Sciweavers

Free Online Productivity Tools i2Speak i2Symbol i2OCR iTex2Img iWeb2Print iWeb2Shot i2Type iPdf2Split iPdf2Merge i2Bopomofo i2Arabic i2Style i2Image i2PDF iLatex2Rtf Sci2ools

33

COLING
2010

favoriteEmaildiscussreport

146views Computational Linguistics» more COLING 2010»

Automatic Committed Belief Tagging

13 years 5 months ago

Automatic Committed Belief Tagging

Download www.aclweb.org

We go beyond simple propositional meaning extraction and present experiments in determining which propositions in text the author believes. We show that deep syntactic parsing helps for this task. Our best feature combination achieves an Fmeasure of 64%, a relative reduction in Fmeasure error of 21% over not using syntactic features.

Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Owen Rambow, Mona T. Diab

Real-time Traffic

COLING 2010 | Computational Linguistics | Deep Syntactic | Simple Propositional Meaning | Syntactic Features |

claim paper

Related Content

» A Comparison of Loopy Belief Propagation and Dual Decomposition for Integrated CCG Superta...

» Training a LogLinear Parser with Loss Functions via SoftmaxMargin

Post Info
More Details (n/a)

Added	13 May 2011
Updated	13 May 2011
Type	Journal
Year	2010
Where	COLING
Authors	Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Owen Rambow, Mona T. Diab

Comments (0)