In this paper we present an approach to abductive reasoning in law by examining it in the context of an argumentation scheme for practical reasoning. We present a particular scheme, based on an established scheme for practical reasoning, that can be used to reason abductively about how an agent might have acted to reach a particular scenario, and the motivations for doing so. Plausibility here depends on a satisfactory explanation of why this particular agent followed these motivations in the particular situation. The scheme is given a formal grounding in terms of Actionbased Alternating Transition Systems and we illustrate the approach with a running legal example. Keywords. Argumentation Schemes, Abductive Reasoning, Practical Reasoning
Floris Bex, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkins