Previous work on dependency parsing used various kinds of combination models but a systematic analysis and comparison of these approaches is lacking. In this paper we implemented such a study for English dependency parsing and find several non-obvious facts: (a) the diversity of base parsers is more important than complex models for learning (e.g., stacking, supervised meta-classification), (b) approximate, linear-time re-parsing algorithms guarantee well-formed dependency trees without significant performance loss, and (c) the simplest scoring model for re-parsing (unweighted voting) performs essentially as well as other more complex models. This study proves that fast and accurate ensemble parsers can be built with minimal effort.
Mihai Surdeanu, Christopher D. Manning