The presence of vulnerable statements in the source code is a crucial problem for maintainers: properly monitoring and, if necessary, removing them is highly desirable to ensure high security and reliability. To this aim, a number of static analysis tools have been developed to detect the presence of instructions that can be subject to vulnerability attacks, ranging from buffer overflow exploitations to command injection and cross-site scripting. Based on the availability of existing tools and of data extracted from software repositories, this paper reports an empirical study on the evolution of vulnerable statements detected in three software systems with different static analysis tools. Specifically, the study investigates on vulnerability evolution trends and on the decay time exhibited by different kinds of vulnerabilities.