Fuzzy Argumentation for Trust

In an open Multi-Agent System, the goals of agents acting on behalf of their owners often conflict with each other. Therefore, a personal agent protecting the interest of a single user cannot always rely on them. Consequently, such a personal agent needs to be able to reason about trusting (information or services provided by) other agents. Existing algorithms that perform such reasoning mainly focus on the immediate utility of a trusting decision, but do not provide an explanation of their actions to the user. This may hinder the acceptance of agentbased technologies in sensitive applications where users need to rely on their personal agents. Against this background, we propose a new approach to trust based on argumentation that aims to expose the rationale behind such trusting decisions. Our solution features a separation of opponent modeling and decision making. It uses possibilistic logic to model behavior of opponents, and we propose an extension of the argumentation framework by...

• Type: Conference
• Year: 2007
• Where: CLIMA
• Authors: Ruben Stranders, Mathijs de Weerdt, Cees Witteveen
• Keywords: CLIMA 2007, Intelligent Agents, Open Multi-agent System, Personal Agents, Trusting Decisions