Sciweavers

ARSCOM
2008

On the non-existence of a maximal partial spread of size 76 in PG(3, 9)

14 years 18 days ago
On the non-existence of a maximal partial spread of size 76 in PG(3, 9)
We prove the non-existence of maximal partial spreads of size 76 in PG(3, 9). Relying on the classification of the minimal blocking sets of size 15 in PG(2, 9) [22], we show that there are only two possibilities for the set of holes of such a maximal partial spread. The weight argument of Blokhuis and Metsch [3] then shows that these sets cannot be the set of holes of a maximal partial spread of size 76. In [17], the non-existence of maximal partial spreads of size 75 in PG(3, 9) is proven. This altogether proves that the largest maximal partial spreads, different from a spread, in PG(3, q = 9) have size q2 - q + 2 = 74.
Olof Heden, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda Pambianco,
Added 08 Dec 2010
Updated 08 Dec 2010
Type Journal
Year 2008
Where ARSCOM
Authors Olof Heden, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda Pambianco, Leo Storme
Comments (0)