Safe and Principled Language Interoperation

Safety of interoperation of program fragments written in different safe languages may fail when the languages have different systems of computational effects: an exception raised by an ML function may have no valid semantic interpretation in the context of a Safe-C caller. Sandboxing costs performance and still may violate the semantics if effects are not taken into account. We show that effect annotations alone are insufficient to guarantee safety, and we present a type system with bounded effect polymorphism designed to verify the compatibility act resources required by the computational models of the interoperating languages. The type system ensures single address space interoperability of statically typed languages with effect mechanisms built of modules for control and state. It is shown sound for safety with respect to the semantics of a language with constructs for selection, simulation, and blocking of resources, targeted as an intermediate language for optimization of resourc...

• Type: Conference
• Year: 1999
• Where: ESOP
• Authors: Valery Trifonov, Zhong Shao
• Keywords: Effect Annotations, ESOP 1999, Programming Languages, Semantics, Valid Semantic Interpretation