Three Scenarios for the Revision of Epistemic States

This position paper discusses the difficulty of interpreting iterated belief revision in the scope of the existing literature. Axioms of iterated belief revision are often presented as extensions of the AGM axioms, upon receiving a sequence of inputs. More recent inputs are assumed to have priority over less recent ones. We argue that this view of iterated revision is at odds with the claim, made by G

• Type: Journal
• Year: 2008
• Where: LOGCOM
• Authors: Didier Dubois
• Keywords: Belief Revision, Epistemic Entrenchment, Input Information, LOGCOM 2008