96 search results - page 6 / 20 » An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge... |
UAI
2004
13 years 9 months ago
2004
Defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning from incomplete and potentially inconsistent knowledge. ...
JELIA
2004
Springer
14 years 1 months ago
2004
Springer
We present a framework for expressing different merging operators for belief sets. This framework is a generalisation of our earlier work concerning consistency-based belief revisi...
NMR
2004
Springer
14 years 1 months ago
2004
Springer
We present a framework for investigating merging operators for belief sets. This framework is a generalisation of our earlier work concerning consistency-based belief revision and...
ARGMAS
2004
Springer
14 years 1 months ago
2004
Springer
Abstract. One of the most difficult problems in multiagent systems involves representing knowledge and beliefs of agents in dynamic environments. New perceptions modify an agent’...
ATAL
2010
Springer
13 years 9 months ago
2010
Springer
cting knowledge base can be seen abstractly as a set of arguments and a binary relation characterising conflict among them. There may be multiple plausible ways to evaluate confli...