Sciweavers

97 search results - page 6 / 20
» Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments
Sort
View
ICALP
2007
Springer
14 years 1 months ago
A Characterization of Non-interactive Instance-Dependent Commitment-Schemes (NIC)
Abstract. We provide a new characterization of certain zero-knowledge protocols as non-interactive instance-dependent commitment-schemes (NIC). To obtain this result we consider th...
Bruce M. Kapron, Lior Malka, Srinivasan Venkatesh
SOSP
2007
ACM
14 years 4 months ago
Tolerating byzantine faults in transaction processing systems using commit barrier scheduling
This paper describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of a replication scheme to handle Byzantine faults in transaction processing database systems. The scheme compares ...
Ben Vandiver, Hari Balakrishnan, Barbara Liskov, S...
BNCOD
2006
69views Database» more  BNCOD 2006»
13 years 9 months ago
Reducing Sub-transaction Aborts and Blocking Time Within Atomic Commit Protocols
Composed Web service transactions executed in distributed networks often require an atomic execution. Guaranteeing atomicity in mobile networks involves a lot more challenges than ...
Stefan Böttcher, Le Gruenwald, Sebastian Ober...
PLDI
2012
ACM
11 years 10 months ago
JANUS: exploiting parallelism via hindsight
This paper addresses the problem of reducing unnecessary conflicts in optimistic synchronization. Optimistic synchronization must ensure that any two concurrently executing trans...
Omer Tripp, Roman Manevich, John Field, Mooly Sagi...
BDA
1997
13 years 9 months ago
A Non-Blocking Single-Phase Commit Protocol for Rigorous Participants
Transactional standards have been promoted by OMG and X/Open to allow heterogeneous resources to participate in an Atomic Commitment Protocol (ACP), namely the two-phase commit pro...
Maha Abdallah, Philippe Pucheral