Sciweavers

4650 search results - page 16 / 930
» Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
Sort
View
ICAIL
2011
ACM
12 years 7 months ago
Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation
A formal two-phase model of democratic policy deliberation is presented, in which in the first phase sufficient and necessary criteria for proposals to be accepted are determine...
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken, Wietske V...
AAMAS
2008
Springer
13 years 7 months ago
Agents that argue and explain classifications
Argumentation is a promising approach used by autonomous agents for reasoning about inconsistent/incomplete/uncertain knowledge, based on the construction and the comparison of ar...
Leila Amgoud, Mathieu Serrurier
ACL
2009
13 years 5 months ago
Robust Machine Translation Evaluation with Entailment Features
Existing evaluation metrics for machine translation lack crucial robustness: their correlations with human quality judgments vary considerably across languages and genres. We beli...
Sebastian Padó, Michel Galley, Daniel Juraf...
KDD
2004
ACM
103views Data Mining» more  KDD 2004»
14 years 8 months ago
An objective evaluation criterion for clustering
We propose and test an objective criterion for evaluation of clustering performance: How well does a clustering algorithm run on unlabeled data aid a classification algorithm? The...
Arindam Banerjee, John Langford
DALT
2007
Springer
13 years 9 months ago
Structured Argumentation in a Mediator for Online Dispute Resolution
Online dispute resolution is becoming the main method when dealing with a conflict in e-commerce. A family of defeasible reasoning patterns is used to provide a useful link betwee...
Ioan Alfred Letia, Adrian Groza