Sciweavers

4650 search results - page 6 / 930
» Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
Sort
View
ATAL
2010
Springer
13 years 8 months ago
Collective argument evaluation as judgement aggregation
cting knowledge base can be seen abstractly as a set of arguments and a binary relation characterising conflict among them. There may be multiple plausible ways to evaluate confli...
Iyad Rahwan, Fernando Tohmé
LREC
2010
147views Education» more  LREC 2010»
13 years 9 months ago
Assigning Wh-Questions to Verbal Arguments: Annotation Tools Evaluation and Corpus Building
This work reports the evaluation and selection of annotation tools to assign wh-question labels to verbal arguments in a sentence. Wh-question assignment discussed herein is a kin...
Magali Sanches Duran, Marcelo Adriano Amânci...
AAAI
2007
13 years 9 months ago
Towards Large Scale Argumentation Support on the Semantic Web
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-scale Web of inter-connected arguments posted by individuals to express their op...
Iyad Rahwan, Fouad Zablith, Chris Reed
IJCAI
1997
13 years 8 months ago
Reasoning Symbolically About Partially Matched Cases
In teaching case-based argumentation skills, the CATO program, an intelligent learning environment, guides students' assessments of partial matches between problems and cases...
Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven
ICTAI
2010
IEEE
13 years 5 months ago
On the Role of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks
The aim of this paper is to study how preferences, which are used to model intrinsic strengths of arguments, can be used in argumentation. We show that they play two roles: i) to r...
Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic