Sciweavers

3829 search results - page 3 / 766
» Improving Our Reviewing Processes
Sort
View
CHI
2011
ACM
12 years 11 months ago
Review spotlight: a user interface for summarizing user-generated reviews using adjective-noun word pairs
Many people read online reviews written by other users to learn more about a product or venue. However, the overwhelming amount of user-generated reviews and variance in length, d...
Koji Yatani, Michael Novati, Andrew Trusty, Khai N...
EDM
2010
140views Data Mining» more  EDM 2010»
13 years 8 months ago
Assessing Reviewer's Performance Based on Mining Problem Localization in Peer-Review Data
Current peer-review software lacks intelligence for responding to students' reviewing performance. As an example of an additional intelligent assessment component to such soft...
Wenting Xiong, Diane J. Litman, Christian D. Schun...
ASWEC
2004
IEEE
13 years 11 months ago
Teaching the Process of Code Review
Behavioural theory predicts that interventions that improving individual reviewers' expertise improves Software Development Technical Review group performance [3, p 6]. This ...
Tor Stålhane, Cat Kutay, Hiyam Al-Kilidar, D...
JSS
2007
174views more  JSS 2007»
13 years 7 months ago
Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain
A consequence of the growing number of empirical studies in software engineering is the need to adopt systematic approaches to assessing and aggregating research outcomes in order...
Pearl Brereton, Barbara A. Kitchenham, David Budge...
GROUP
2009
ACM
14 years 1 months ago
Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate
Scientiï¬c peer review, open source software development, wikis, and other domains use distributed review to improve quality of created content by providing feedback to the workâ...
Ken Reily, Pam Ludford Finnerty, Loren G. Terveen