Sciweavers

2007 search results - page 13 / 402

» MUC-3 evaluation metrics

21

COLING
2002

150views Computational Linguistics» more COLING 2002»

A Critique and Improvement of an Evaluation Metric for Text Segmentation

13 years 8 months ago

A Critique and Improvement of an Evaluation Metric for Text Segmentation

Download people.ischool.berkeley.edu

Lev Pevzner, Marti A. Hearst

claim paper

Read More »

21

CAL
2007

143views Software Engineering» more CAL 2007»

CIM: A Reliable Metric for Evaluating Program Phase Classifications

13 years 8 months ago

CIM: A Reliable Metric for Evaluating Program Phase Classifications

Download www.arctic.umn.edu

Sreekumar V. Kodakara, Jinpyo Kim, David J. Lilja,...

claim paper

Read More »

25

VC
2010

179views more VC 2010»

A comparative study of existing metrics for 3D-mesh segmentation evaluation

13 years 3 months ago

A comparative study of existing metrics for 3D-mesh segmentation evaluation

Download liris.cnrs.fr

Halim Benhabiles, Jean-Philippe Vandeborre, Guilla...

claim paper

Read More »

26

EMNLP
2011

145views Natural Language Processing» more EMNLP 2011»

Better Evaluation Metrics Lead to Better Machine Translation

12 years 8 months ago

Better Evaluation Metrics Lead to Better Machine Translation

Download aclweb.org

Chang Liu, Daniel Dahlmeier, Hwee Tou Ng

claim paper

Read More »

24

ECIR
2009
Springer

130views Information Technology» more ECIR 2009»

Choosing the Best MT Programs for CLIR Purposes - Can MT Metrics Be Helpful?

14 years 5 months ago

Choosing the Best MT Programs for CLIR Purposes - Can MT Metrics Be Helpful?

Download www.mt-archive.info

Abstract. This paper describes usage of MT metrics in choosing the best candidates for MT-based query translation resources. Our main metrics is METEOR, but we also use NIST and BL...

Kimmo Kettunen

claim paper

Read More »

« Prev « First page 13 / 402 Last » Next »