Sciweavers

3557 search results - page 5 / 712
» Reviews
Sort
View
CSCW
2010
ACM
14 years 4 months ago
Understanding deja reviewers
People who review products on the web invest considerable time and energy in what they write. So why would someone write a review that restates earlier reviews? Our work looks to ...
Eric Gilbert, Karrie Karahalios
GROUP
2009
ACM
14 years 2 months ago
Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate
Scientiï¬c peer review, open source software development, wikis, and other domains use distributed review to improve quality of created content by providing feedback to the workâ...
Ken Reily, Pam Ludford Finnerty, Loren G. Terveen
ICSE
2009
IEEE-ACM
14 years 2 months ago
Can peer code reviews be exploited for later information needs?
Code reviews have proven to be an effective means of improving overall software quality. During the review, there is an exchange of knowledge between the code author and reviewer ...
Andrew Sutherland, Gina Venolia
EMNLP
2006
13 years 9 months ago
Automatically Assessing Review Helpfulness
User-supplied reviews are widely and increasingly used to enhance ecommerce and other websites. Because reviews can be numerous and varying in quality, it is important to assess h...
Soo-Min Kim, Patrick Pantel, Timothy Chklovski, Ma...
ELPUB
2004
ACM
14 years 1 months ago
Experiences with web-based scientific collaboration: managing the submission and review process of scientific conferences
the registration of participants, submission and reviewing of abstracts, full-paper submission, reviewing and publishing. By means of other SOPS-services already a repository with ...
Bob Martens, Tomo Cerovsek