Sciweavers

792 search results - page 21 / 159
» Value Based Argumentation Frameworks
Sort
View
AI
2006
Springer
13 years 7 months ago
Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
Evaluative arguments are pervasive in natural human communication. In countless situations people attempt to advise or persuade their interlocutors that something is desirable (vs...
Giuseppe Carenini, Johanna D. Moore
SLOGICA
2011
13 years 2 months ago
Maximal and Premaximal Paraconsistency in the Framework of Three-Valued Semantics
Maximality is a desirable property of paraconsistent logics, motivated by the aspiration to tolerate inconsistencies, but at the same time retain from classical logic as much as p...
Ofer Arieli, Arnon Avron, Anna Zamansky
IHI
2010
127views Healthcare» more  IHI 2010»
13 years 2 months ago
Using clinical preferences in argumentation about evidence from clinical trials
Medical practice is increasingly based on the best available evidence, but the volume of information requires many clinicians to rely on systematic reviews rather than the primary...
Anthony Hunter, Matthew Williams
ATAL
2007
Springer
14 years 1 months ago
Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS
In order to support semantic interoperation in open environments, where agents can dynamically join or leave and no prior assumption can be made on the ontologies to align, the di...
Loredana Laera, Ian Blacoe, Valentina A. M. Tamma,...
IPMU
2010
Springer
13 years 6 months ago
Keeping Secrets in Possibilistic Knowledge Bases with Necessity-Valued Privacy Policies
Controlled Query Evaluation (CQE) is a logical framework for the protection of secrets in databases. In this article, we extend the CQE framework to possibilistic logic: knowledge ...
Lena Wiese