Inference from Controversial Arguments

Abstract. We present new careful semantics within Dung’s theory of argumentation. Under such careful semantics, two arguments cannot belong to the same extension whenever one of them indirectly attacks a third argument while the other one indirectly defends the third. We argue that our semantics lead to a better handling of controversial arguments than Dung’s ones in some settings. We compare the careful inference relations induced by our semantics w.r.t. cautiousness; we also compare them with the inference relations induced by Dung’s semantics.

• Type: Conference
• Year: 2005
• Where: LPAR
• Authors: Sylvie Coste-Marquis, Caroline Devred, Pierre Marquis
• Keywords: Careful Inference Relations, Careful Semantics, Dung’s Theory, LPAR 2005