Sciweavers

IFL
2001
Springer

Proving the Correctness of the STG Machine

14 years 3 months ago
Proving the Correctness of the STG Machine
Abstract. J. Launchbury gave an operational semantics for lazy evaluation and showed that it is sound and complete w.r.t. a denotational s of the language. P. Sestoft then introduced several abstract machines for lazy evaluation and showed that they were sound and complete w.r.t. Launchbury’s operational semantics. We go a step forward and show that the Spineless Tagless G-machine is complete and (almost) sound w.r.t. one of Sestoft’s machines. In the way to this goal we also prove some interesting properties about the operational semantics and about Sestoft’s machines which clarify some minor points on garbage collection and on closures’ local environments. Unboxed values and primitive operators are excluded from the study.
Alberto de la Encina, Ricardo Pena
Added 30 Jul 2010
Updated 30 Jul 2010
Type Conference
Year 2001
Where IFL
Authors Alberto de la Encina, Ricardo Pena
Comments (0)