Sciweavers

Free Online Productivity Tools i2Speak i2Symbol i2OCR iTex2Img iWeb2Print iWeb2Shot i2Type iPdf2Split iPdf2Merge i2Bopomofo i2Arabic i2Style i2Image i2PDF iLatex2Rtf Sci2ools

28

EPIA
1997
Springer

favoriteEmaildiscussreport

117views Artificial Intelligence» more EPIA 1997»

Controlling for Unexpected Goals when Planning in a Mixed-Initiative Setting

14 years 3 months ago

Controlling for Unexpected Goals when Planning in a Mixed-Initiative Setting

Download www.cs.cmu.edu

dimension of abstraction and speciﬁcity, and they may mix both top-level goals and subgoals when describing what they want a plan to do. We show how the Prodigy planning system has met these challenges when integrated with a force deployment tool called ForMAT and describe what opportunities this poses for a generative planning framework.

Michael T. Cox, Manuela M. Veloso

Real-time Traffic

Artificial Intelligence | EPIA 1997 | Force Deployment Tool | Generative Planning Framework | Top-level Goals |

claim paper

Related Content

» Anytime Synthetic Projection Maximizing the Probability of Goal Satisfaction

» Subgoal Ordering and Granularity Control for Incremental Planning

» An Integrated Approach of Learning Planning and Execution

» Evolutionary path planner for UAVs in realistic environments

» Scaling up Heuristic Planning with Relational Decision Trees

» Blended local planning for generating safe and feasible paths

» A Model for Multiple Outcomes Games

» Generative Planning for Hybrid Systems Based on Flow Tubes

» Local Conditional HighLevel Robot Programs

Post Info
More Details (n/a)

Added	07 Aug 2010
Updated	07 Aug 2010
Type	Conference
Year	1997
Where	EPIA
Authors	Michael T. Cox, Manuela M. Veloso

Comments (0)