From Policy-Making Statements to First-Order Logic

Within a framework for enriched on-line discussion forums for e-government policy-making, pro and con statements for positions are input, structurally related, then logically represented and evaluated. The framework builds on current technologies for multi-threaded discussion, natural language processing, ontologies, and formal argumentation frameworks. This paper focuses on the natural language processing of statements in the framework. A small sample policy discussion is presented. We adopt and apply a controlled natural language (Attempto Controlled English) to constrain the domain of discourse, eliminate ambiguity and unclarity, allow a logical representation of statements which supports inference and consistency checking, and facilitate information extraction. Each of the polity statements is automatically translated into first-order logic. The result is logical representation of the policy discussion which we can query, draw inferences (given ground statements), test for consiste...

• Type: Conference
• Year: 2010
• Where: EGOV
• Authors: Adam Wyner, Tom M. van Engers, Kiavash Bahreini
• Keywords: EGOV 2010, Information Technology, Natural Language, Natural Language Processing, Policy Discussion