Phylogenetic networks do not need to be complex: using fewer reticulations to represent conflicting clusters

Phylogenetic trees are widely used to display estimates of how groups of species evolved. Each phylogenetic tree can be seen as a collection of clusters, subgroups of the species that evolved from a common ancestor. When phylogenetic trees are obtained for several data sets (e.g. for different genes), then their clusters are often contradicting. Consequently, the set of all clusters of such a data set cannot be combined into a single phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that can be used to display more complex evolutionary histories, including reticulate events such as hybridizations, recombinations and horizontal gene transfers. Here we present the new CASS algorithm that can combine any set of clusters into a phylogenetic network. We show that the networks constructed by CASS are usually simpler than networks constructed by other available methods. Moreover, we show that CASS is guaranteed to produce a network with at most two reticulat...

• Type: Journal
• Year: 2010
• Where: BIOINFORMATICS
• Authors: Leo van Iersel, Steven Kelk, Regula Rupp, Daniel H. Huson
• Keywords: BIOINFORMATICS 2010, Phylogenetic Network, Phylogenetic Trees, Single Phylogenetic Tree