Sciweavers

ICICS
2010
Springer

Proving Coercion-Resistance of Scantegrity II

13 years 10 months ago
Proving Coercion-Resistance of Scantegrity II
By now, many voting protocols have been proposed that, among others, are designed to achieve coercion-resistance, i.e., resistance to vote buying and voter coercion. Scantegrity II is among the most prominent and successful such protocols in that it has been used in several elections. However, almost none of the modern voting protocols used in practice, including Scantegrity II, has undergone a rigorous cryptographic analysis. In this paper, we prove that Scantegrity II enjoys an optimal level of coercion-resistance, i.e., the same level of coercion-resistance as an ideal voting protocol (which merely reveals the outcome of the election), except for so-called forced abstention attacks. This result is obtained under the (necessary) assumption that the workstation used in the protocol is honest. Our analysis is based on a rigorous cryptographic definition of coercionresistance we recently proposed. We argue that this definition is in fact the only existing cryptographic definition of coe...
Ralf Küsters, Tomasz Truderung, Andreas Vogt
Added 12 Feb 2011
Updated 12 Feb 2011
Type Journal
Year 2010
Where ICICS
Authors Ralf Küsters, Tomasz Truderung, Andreas Vogt
Comments (0)