Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism

Abstract. The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper, we contribute to this kind of analysis by providing a systematic comparison of a significant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal, prudent, and CF2 semantics) using both a weak and a strong skepticism relation. Key words: Argumentation semantics, Skepticism

• Type: Conference
• Year: 2007
• Where: ECSQARU
• Authors: Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin
• Keywords: Argumentation Semantics, ECSQARU 2007, Skepticism Relation, Strong Skepticism Relation