Sciweavers

Free Online Productivity Tools i2Speak i2Symbol i2OCR iTex2Img iWeb2Print iWeb2Shot i2Type iPdf2Split iPdf2Merge i2Bopomofo i2Arabic i2Style i2Image i2PDF iLatex2Rtf Sci2ools

23

ECSQARU
2007
Springer

favoriteEmaildiscussreport

76views Automated Reasoning» more ECSQARU 2007»

Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism

14 years 5 months ago

Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism

Download www.ing.unibs.it

Abstract. The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper, we contribute to this kind of analysis by providing a systematic comparison of a signiﬁcant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal, prudent, and CF2 semantics) using both a weak and a strong skepticism relation. Key words: Argumentation semantics, Skepticism

Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin

Real-time Traffic

Argumentation Semantics | ECSQARU 2007 | Skepticism Relation | Strong Skepticism Relation |

claim paper

Related Content

» On principlebased evaluation of extensionbased argumentation semantics

» A TopDown Procedure for Disjunctive WellFounded Semantics

» Abduction Argumentation and BiDisjunctive Logic Programs

» The Effect of Syntactic Representation on Semantic Role Labeling

» A Tradeoff between Compositionality and Complexity in the Semantics of Dimensional Adjecti...

Post Info
More Details (n/a)

Added	07 Jun 2010
Updated	07 Jun 2010
Type	Conference
Year	2007
Where	ECSQARU
Authors	Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin

Comments (0)