Microarchitectural exploration with Liberty

To find the best designs, architects must rapidly simulate many design alternatives and have confidence in the results. Unfortunately, the most prevalent simulator construction methodology, hand-writing monolithic simulators in sequential programming languages, yields simulators that are hard to retarget, limiting the number of designs explored, and hard to understand, instilling little confidence in the model. Simulator construction tools have been developed to address these problems, but analysis reveals that they do not address the root cause, the error-prone mapping between the concurrent, structural hardware domain and the sequential, functional software domain. This paper presents an analysis of these problems and their solution, the Liberty Simulation Environment (LSE). LSE automatically constructs a simulator from a machine description that closely resembles the hardware, ensuring fidelity in the model. Furthermore, through a strict but general component communication cont...

• Type: Conference
• Year: 2002
• Where: MICRO
• Authors: Manish Vachharajani, Neil Vachharajani, David A. Penry, Jason A. Blome, David I. August
• Keywords: Hardware, MICRO 2002, Simulator, Simulator Construction, Simulator Construction Methodology