Sciweavers

96 search results - page 10 / 20
» An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge...
Sort
View
ECSQARU
2009
Springer
14 years 2 months ago
Merging Belief Bases Represented by Logic Programs
Abstract. This paper presents a method which allows for merging beliefs expressed thanks to logic programming with stable model semantics. This method is based on the syntactic mer...
Julien Hué, Odile Papini, Eric Würbel
INFFUS
2006
104views more  INFFUS 2006»
13 years 7 months ago
Reasoning with multiple-source information in a possibilistic logic framework
This paper addresses the problem of merging uncertain information in the framework of possibilistic logic. It presents several syntactic combination rules to merge possibilistic k...
Salem Benferhat, Claudio Sossai
ICIA
2007
13 years 10 months ago
Learning Interaction between Conflicting Human Agents and Their Assistants
We build the generic methodology based on machine learning and reasoning to detect the patterns of interaction between conflicting agents, including humans and their assistants. L...
Boris Galitsky, Boris Kovalerchuk
ENTCS
2002
157views more  ENTCS 2002»
13 years 7 months ago
Arguments and Misunderstandings: Fuzzy Unification for Negotiating Agents
In this paper, we develop the notion of fuzzy unification and incorporate it into a novel fuzzy argumentation framework for extended logic programming. We make the following contri...
Michael Schroeder, Ralf Schweimeier
UAI
2004
13 years 9 months ago
Using Arguments for Making Decisions: A Possibilistic Logic Approach
Humans currently use arguments for explaining choices which are already made, or for evaluating potential choices. Each potential choice has usually pros and cons of various stren...
Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade