Sciweavers

6 search results - page 1 / 2
» Handling Inconsistency with Preference-Based Argumentation
Sort
View
SUM
2010
Springer
13 years 9 months ago
Handling Inconsistency with Preference-Based Argumentation
Abstract. Argumentation is a promising approach for handling inconsistent knowledge bases, based on the justification of plausible conclusions by arguments. Due to inconsistency, ...
Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic
KI
2009
Springer
14 years 5 months ago
An Argumentation-Based Approach to Handling Inconsistencies in DL-Lite
As a tractable description logic, DL-Lite provides a good compromise between expressive power and computational complexity of inference. It is therefore important to study ways of ...
Xiaowang Zhang, Zuoquan Lin
UAI
1993
14 years 15 days ago
Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
: This paper presents and discusses several methods for reasoning from inconsistent knowledge bases. A so-called argumentative-consequence relation, taking into account the existen...
Salem Benferhat, Didier Dubois, Henri Prade
NMR
2004
Springer
14 years 4 months ago
Generation and evaluation of different types of arguments in negotiation
Until now, AI argumentation-based systems have been mainly developed for handling inconsistency. In that explanation-oriented perspective, only one type of argument has been consi...
Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade
AAAI
1998
14 years 16 days ago
Hermes: Supporting Argumentative Discourse in Multi-Agent Decision Making
This paper describes HERMES,a system that enhances group decision making by providing an argumentation frameworkto the agents involved. Thesystem organizes the existing knowledgei...
Nikos I. Karacapilidis, Dimitris Papadias