Sciweavers

1912 search results - page 4 / 383
» On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Sort
View
SYNTHESE
2008
81views more  SYNTHESE 2008»
13 years 7 months ago
Adequate formalization
This article identifies problems with regard to providing criteria that regulate the matching of logical formulae and natural language. We then take on to solve these problems by d...
Michael Baumgartner, Timm Lampert
AAMAS
2008
Springer
13 years 7 months ago
Agents that argue and explain classifications
Argumentation is a promising approach used by autonomous agents for reasoning about inconsistent/incomplete/uncertain knowledge, based on the construction and the comparison of ar...
Leila Amgoud, Mathieu Serrurier
COMMA
2010
13 years 2 months ago
A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework
In order to support the interchange of ideas and data between different projects and applications in the area of computational argumentation, a common ontology for computational ar...
Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed
WFLP
2000
Springer
124views Algorithms» more  WFLP 2000»
13 years 11 months ago
A Formal Approach to Reasoning about the Effectiveness of Partial Evaluation
We introduce a framework for assessing the effectiveness of partial evaluators in functional logic languages. Our framework is based on properties of the rewrite system that models...
Elvira Albert, Sergio Antoy, Germán Vidal
COMMA
2006
13 years 8 months ago
The Carneades Argumentation Framework - Using Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions
Abstract. In 2005, Gordon and Walton presented initial ideas for a computational model of defeasible argument [12, 26], which builds on and elaborates Walton's theory of argum...
Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton