Sciweavers

1912 search results - page 6 / 383
» On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Sort
View
ARGMAS
2008
Springer
13 years 9 months ago
Argumentation Based Resolution of Conflicts between Desires and Normative Goals
Norms represent what ought to be done, and their fulfillment can be seen as benefiting the overall system, society or organisation. However, individual agent goals (desire) may con...
Sanjay Modgil, Michael Luck
ICAIL
2011
ACM
12 years 7 months ago
Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation
A formal two-phase model of democratic policy deliberation is presented, in which in the first phase sufficient and necessary criteria for proposals to be accepted are determine...
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken, Wietske V...
ICCD
2004
IEEE
137views Hardware» more  ICCD 2004»
14 years 4 months ago
Comparative Study of Strategies for Formal Verification of High-Level Processors
Compared are different methods for evaluation of formulas expressing microprocessor correctness in the logic of Equality with Uninterpreted Functions and Memories (EUFM) by transl...
Miroslav N. Velev
JAPLL
2008
98views more  JAPLL 2008»
13 years 7 months ago
A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation
In traditional mathematical models of argumentation an argument often consists of a chain of rules or reasons, beginning with premisses and leading to a conclusion that is endorse...
Martin Caminada
KER
2008
134views more  KER 2008»
13 years 7 months ago
A review of current defeasible reasoning implementations
This article surveys existing practical implementations of both defeasible and argumentationbased reasoning engines and associated literature. We aim to summarise the current stat...
Daniel Bryant, Paul J. Krause