Extended argumentation framework is a formalism where defeat relations are determined by establishing a preference between arguments involved in symmetric conflicts. This process ...
A formal two-phase model of democratic policy deliberation is presented, in which in the first phase sufficient and necessary criteria for proposals to be accepted are determine...
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken, Wietske V...
Standard semantic accounts of the equative ascribe it an `at least' meaning, deriving an `exactly' reading when necessary via scalar implicature. I argue for a particular...
Abstract. This paper argues that accrual should be modelled in terms of reasoning about the application of preferences to sets of arguments, and shows how such reasoning can be for...
We present a procedure for computing the sceptical "ideal semantics" for argumentation in assumption-based frameworks. This semantics was first proposed for logic program...