Sciweavers

26 search results - page 3 / 6
» SpecDiff: debugging formal specifications
Sort
View
ICSE
2008
IEEE-ACM
14 years 7 months ago
On the automation of fixing software bugs
Software Testing can take up to half of the resources of the development of new software. Although there has been a lot of work on automating the testing phase, fixing a bug after...
Andrea Arcuri
DAC
2010
ACM
13 years 10 months ago
Scalable specification mining for verification and diagnosis
Effective system verification requires good specifications. The lack of sufficient specifications can lead to misses of critical bugs, design re-spins, and time-to-market slips. I...
Wenchao Li, Alessandro Forin, Sanjit A. Seshia
ERSHOV
2006
Springer
13 years 11 months ago
An ASM Semantics of Token Flow in UML 2 Activity Diagrams
Abstract. The token flow semantics of UML 2 activity diagrams is formally defined using Abstract State Machines. Interruptible activity regions and multiplicity bounds for pins are...
Stefan Sarstedt, Walter Guttmann
ICSE
2009
IEEE-ACM
14 years 8 months ago
Automatically finding patches using genetic programming
Automatic repair of programs has been a longstanding goal in software engineering, yet debugging remains a largely manual process. We introduce a fully automated method for locati...
Westley Weimer, ThanhVu Nguyen, Claire Le Goues, S...
RE
2001
Springer
13 years 12 months ago
Events and Constraints: A Graphical Editor for Capturing Logic Requirements of Programs
A logic model checker can be an effective tool for debugging software applications. A stumbling block can be that model checking tools expect the user to supply a formal statement...
Margaret H. Smith, Gerard J. Holzmann, Kousha Etes...