We study the formal relationships between the inferential aspects of Carneades (a general argumentation framework) and Defeasible Logic. The outcome of the investigation is that t...
Argumentation is the process by which arguments are constructed and handled. Argumentation constitutes a major component of human intelligence. The ability to engage in argumentat...
This paper addresses the problem of revising a Dung-style argumentation framework by adding finitely many new arguments which may interact with old ones. We study the behavior of t...
In order to support the interchange of ideas and data between different projects and applications in the area of computational argumentation, a common ontology for computational ar...
Abstract. This paper combines two recent extensions of Dung's abstract argumenrameworks in order to define an abstract formalism for reasoning about preferences in structured ...
Conflicts exist in multi-agent systems. Agents have different interests and desires. Agents also hold different beliefs and may make different assumptions. To resolve conflicts, ag...
Abstract. This paper argues that accrual should be modelled in terms of reasoning about the application of preferences to sets of arguments, and shows how such reasoning can be for...
Argumentative discussions are common in Web 2.0 applications, but the social Web still offers limited or no explicit support for argumentation. As Web 2.0 applications become more ...
Extension-based argumentation semantics have shown to be a suitable approach for performing practical reasoning. An important concern in extensionbased-argumentation semantics is t...
This research applies ideas from argumentation theory in the context of semantic wikis, aiming to provide support for structured-large scale argumentation between human agents. The...