Abstract. This paper combines two recent extensions of Dung's abstract argumenrameworks in order to define an abstract formalism for reasoning about preferences in structured ...
Extension-based argumentation semantics have shown to be a suitable approach for performing practical reasoning. An important concern in extensionbased-argumentation semantics is t...
In this paper we discuss how recent developments in argumentation frameworks, most notably Extended Argumentation Frameworks, can inform the representation of a body of case law u...
In many cases of disagreement it is impossible to demonstrate that either party is wrong. The role of argument in such cases is to persuade rather than refute. Following Perelman, ...
Extended Argumentation Frameworks (EAFs) are a proposed formalism that develop abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) by allowing attacks between arguments to be attacked themselv...
Paul E. Dunne, Sanjay Modgil, Trevor J. M. Bench-C...
In the context of Dung's theory of abstract argumentation frameworks, the comparison between different semantics is often carried out by resorting to some specific examples co...
We build on recent work on argumentation frameworks for generating desires and plans. We provide a rich instantiDung's abstract argumentation framework for (i) generating con...
We build on recent work on argumentation frameworks for generating desires and plans. We provide a rich instantiDung's abstract argumentation framework for (i) generating con...
Within the last years, especially since the work proposed by Dung in 1995, argumentation has emerged as a central issue in Artificial Intelligence. With the so called argumentatio...
Abstract argumentation frameworks have received a lot of interest in recent years. Most computational problems in this area are intractable but several tractable fragments have be...