Sciweavers

Free Online Productivity Tools i2Speak i2Symbol i2OCR iTex2Img iWeb2Print iWeb2Shot i2Type iPdf2Split iPdf2Merge i2Bopomofo i2Arabic i2Style i2Image i2PDF iLatex2Rtf Sci2ools

23

ACL
2003

favoriteEmaildiscussreport

79views Computational Linguistics» more ACL 2003»

Is it Harder to Parse Chinese, or the Chinese Treebank?

14 years 7 days ago

Is it Harder to Parse Chinese, or the Chinese Treebank?

Download nlp.stanford.edu

Roger Levy, Christopher D. Manning

Real-time Traffic

ACL 2003 | ACL 2007 |

claim paper

Related Content

» Exploiting Multiple Treebanks for Parsing with Quasisynchronous Grammars

» Syntactic Parsing with Hierarchical Modeling

» Hybrid Constituent and Dependency Parsing with Tsinghua Chinese Treebank

» Joint Syntactic and Semantic Parsing of Chinese

» Cross Language Dependency Parsing using a Bilingual Lexicon

» Automatic Treebank Conversion via Informed Decoding

» Chasing the ghost recovering empty categories in the Chinese Treebank

» Improving Dependency Parsing with Subtrees from AutoParsed Data

» Chinese Comma Disambiguation for Discourse Analysis

Post Info
More Details (n/a)

Added	31 Oct 2010
Updated	31 Oct 2010
Type	Conference
Year	2003
Where	ACL
Authors	Roger Levy, Christopher D. Manning

Comments (0)