Abstract. Skepticism is one of the most important semantic intuitions in artificial intelligence. The semantics formalizing skeptical reasoning in (disjunctive) logic programming is usually named well-founded semantics. However, the issue of defining and computing the well-founded semantics for disjunctive programs and databases has proved to be far more complex and difficult than for normal logic programs. The argumentation-based semantics WFDS is among the most promising proposals that attempts to define a natural well-founded semantics for disjunctive programs. In this paper, we propose a top-down procedure for WFDS called D-SLS Resolution, which naturally extends the Global SLS-resolution and SLI-resolution. We prove that D-SLS Resolution is sound and complete with respect to WFDS. This result in turn provides a further yet more powerful argument in favor of the WFDS.